Department of Entomology
  • About
    • At a Glance
    • Welcome From the Chair
    • Code of Conduct
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion >
      • DEI Working Group
      • Resources
    • Departmental History
    • For Alumni
    • Support Entomology >
      • Steinhauer Scholarship Fund
    • Proposal Resources
    • Contact >
      • Directions
  • News
    • News
    • Seminar Blog
    • Seminar Schedule
    • Awards
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Post Docs
    • Students
    • Staff
    • Alumni
  • Academics
    • Graduate >
      • Admissions
      • MS Degree Requirements
      • PhD Degree Requirements
      • Graduate Student Resources
      • Financial Assistance
      • Award & Funding Opportunities
      • Entomology Student Organization
    • Online Masters in Applied Entomology
    • Undergraduate >
      • Entomology Minor
      • Honors Program
  • Research
    • IPM & Biological Control of Agricultural, Urban & Forest Pests
    • Ecology, Conservation, Restoration, Climate Change >
      • Pollinator Science and Apiculture
    • Evolution, Systematics and Evo-Devo
    • Genetics & Genomics and Medical Entomology
  • Extension/Outreach
    • Educational Outreach
    • Insect Camp
    • Insect Drawings
    • Insect Identification
    • Pesticide Education and Assessment Program
    • Plant Diagnostic Laboratory (PDL)

The role of indigenous knowledge and land management practices in conservation

3/4/2022

 
written by: Kathleen Ciola Evans & Eva Perry 

UMD Department of Entomology
Land Acknowledgement: 
​
​The United Kingdom hosted the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland from October 31st through November 13th. Although some were hopeful that the world could come together on an agreement to mitigate climate change, many voices were left unheard during the symposium, including those of Indigenous groups. Their inclusion is particularly important because of the vulnerability of Indigenous lands to climate change and the potential model of sustainable land management that Indigenous groups could provide. Additionally, a significant amount of global biodiversity is concentrated in territories Indigenous Peoples managel. Ancestral and indigenous communities contribute next to zero toward carbon emissions, yet they are the most vulnerable communities to climate change2. Despite this, Indigenous perspectives on sustainable land and water management were mostly sidelined at the conference.
Picture
Figure 1: Farrell et al., 20213. Map overlay representing aggregate reduction of Indigenous Peoples’ land tenure in the US.
​Indigenous Peoples are stewards of approximately four percent of total land in the United Statesl. The lands to which many Indigenous Peoples were forcibly migrated contain fewer resources compared to their historical lands, and much of this land is exposed to more extreme heat, reduced precipitation, heightened wildfire exposure, and reductions in economic mineral value which directly reduces food and water resources. On average, these lands represent a mere 2.6 percent of their historical lands (Figure 1). Forty percent of Indigenous Peoples in the U.S. do not even have land that is recognized by the state and/or federal government2.
 
Indigenous and local communities contribute in many significant ways to biodiversity by creating habitats that are much more diverse and species-rich than typical agricultural landscapes2. Much of the natural habitat within Indigenous-managed land is ecologically equivalent to formally conserved land areas. There is less deforestation and biodiversity is declining more slowly in areas managed by Indigenous Peoples2,4. However, at least sixteen percent of Indigenous-managed land faces high risks from future development and resource extraction. Recent conservation commitments by the countries which make up the G7 (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, US) could also threaten Indigenous land rights. In many countries, once land is formally protected or conserved, activities such as hunting and fishing are prohibited, farming practices are limited and land access restricted, which jeopardizes the Indigenous communities that rely on those land5.
 
Although Indigenous Peoples’ cultures and livelihoods are often deeply embedded in the land, their knowledge of land management and contributory effort is frequently discounted and goes unrecognized6. Only land that falls within formally protected or conserved areas in the US is recognized as conserved land by the government and much of the land managed by Indigenous Peoples falls outside of these conserved areas. A report by the ICCA Consortium estimated that 21% of global land is intact due to the conservation practices of Indigenous Peoples, compared to fourteen percent protected and conserved by countries. 
Picture
Figure 2: Fa et al., 20207. Overlap of global intact forest landscapes and Indigenous Peoples’ lands.
Approximately 36% of the intact forest landscape worldwide overlaps with Indigenous-managed lands (Figure 2). While some loss of intact forest landscape on Indigenous-managed lands has occurred since 2000, the loss is less than non-Indigenous-managed lands (8.2% compared to 9.6% across all countries). Further, the deforestation that does take place on Indigenous-managed lands is often without the consent of the Indigenous Peoples who manage that land7. Unauthorized land destruction leads to the loss of life, as well as the loss of land and livelihoods. From 2009 to 2019, more than 300 people – many of whom were members of Indigenous communities – were murdered due to conflicts over land use in the Amazon. These deaths are a result of the increasingly violent clashes between indigenous land right activists seeking to defend their land and commercial investors8. In the US, there have been violent clashes between protestors, indigenous activists and the police over pipelines. Before the Keystone pipeline was vetoed, the 2,735-kilometre pipeline by TransCanada carrying 800,000 barrels of oil a day from Alberta to Texas would have cut through Indigenous territories in Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma.
 
The vast majority of our planet’s land has been managed for thousands of years to varying degrees by Indigenous peoples, and contemporary losses of biodiversity can be directly attributed to the impacts of colonialism on previously Indigenous-managed lands9. Biodiversity data that was collected from formally protected areas and land managed by Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Brazil, and Canada, indicate for all three countries that Indigenous-managed lands have equal or higher biodiversity than the designated protected areas, which can at least partly be attributed to Indigenous land management practices,7 which are becoming widely referred to as “Traditional Ecological Knowledge” (     TEK).
​
TEK management strategies used by Indigenous Peoples include traditional burning, fishing traps, and forestry practices that are often uniquely suited to an environment. For example, in the regions of the United States now known as Wisconsin, Michigan, and Illinois, the Menominee Tribe practices sustained-yield forest management informed by their spiritual beliefs and contemporary scientific knowledge. These practices ensure that trees are harvested in amounts that will allow for a steady supply of timber far into the future. TEK can also be incorporated into ecological restoration of degraded lands. In the U.S. Pacific Northwest, many Indigenous communities are involved in ecological restoration of shellfish populations and native plant species3. TEK can and should be incorporated into restoration and conservation efforts, and should be incorporated into global efforts to abate the effects of climate change, including plans made a COP26. 
​
Historically, conservation has been exclusionary – framed as protecting “pristine” nature from humans, and rejecting the notion that humans and human activity can be part of sustainable, healthy ecosystems. Our conservation framework should protect Indigenous rights to land stewardship, and incorporate Indigenous sustainable land management practices uniquely suited to the area that leverage centuries of regional knowledge. Including and amplifying Indigenous voices in science is of paramount importance to our efforts to mitigate biodiversity loss and the effects of global environmental change, while simultaneously protecting those most vulnerable to its consequences.
 
Authors:
Kathleen Ciola Evans is a PhD student in the EspindoLab studying plant-pollinator interactions in agroecological landscapes.
 
Eva Perry is a PhD student in the Burghardt Lab, who is studying the impacts of urbanization on trophic relationships between trees and insects.
 
References and Further Reading:
1. Kimmerer RW (2002). Weaving Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Biological Education: A Call to Action. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/52/5/432/236145
 
2. Farrell J et al. (2021). Effects of land dispossession and forced migration on Indigenous Peoples in North America. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe4943
3. Sneed A (2019). What Conservation Efforts Can Learn from Indigenous Communities.  Scientific American
4. ICCA Consortium (2021). Territories of Life: 2021 Report. ICCA Consortium: worldwide. Available at: report.territoriesoflife.org. ISBN 978-2-9701386-3-1 
5. Schuster R et al. (2019). Vertebrate biodiversity on Indigenous-managed lands in Australia, Brazil, and Canada equals that in protected areas. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.002
 
6. Jones B (2021). Indigenous people are the world’s biggest conservationists, but they rarely get credit for it. Vox “Down to Earth” Series
 
7. Fa JE et al. (2020). Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes. DOI: 10.1002/fee.2148
 
8. Villegas A and Robles F (2020). Conflicts over Indigenous Land grow more violent in Central America, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/world/americas/central-america-indigenous-conflicts.html
 
9. Ellis EC et al. (2021). People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for 12,000 years. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023483118

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Awards
    Colloquium
    Faculty Spotlight
    Fall 2013 Colloquium
    Fall 2014 Colloquium
    Fall 2015 Colloquium
    Fall 2016 Colloquium
    Featured
    Innovation
    News
    Publications
    Science Projects
    SESYNC
    Spring 2014 Colloquium
    Spring 2015 Colloquium
    Spring 2016 Colloquium
    Talks
    Undergraduate

    Archives

    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
Picture
Department of Entomology 
University of Maryland 
4112 Plant Sciences Building 
College Park, MD 20742-4454
USA

Telephone: 301.405.3911 
Fax: 301.314.9290
Picture
Picture
Web Accessibility
  • About
    • At a Glance
    • Welcome From the Chair
    • Code of Conduct
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion >
      • DEI Working Group
      • Resources
    • Departmental History
    • For Alumni
    • Support Entomology >
      • Steinhauer Scholarship Fund
    • Proposal Resources
    • Contact >
      • Directions
  • News
    • News
    • Seminar Blog
    • Seminar Schedule
    • Awards
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Post Docs
    • Students
    • Staff
    • Alumni
  • Academics
    • Graduate >
      • Admissions
      • MS Degree Requirements
      • PhD Degree Requirements
      • Graduate Student Resources
      • Financial Assistance
      • Award & Funding Opportunities
      • Entomology Student Organization
    • Online Masters in Applied Entomology
    • Undergraduate >
      • Entomology Minor
      • Honors Program
  • Research
    • IPM & Biological Control of Agricultural, Urban & Forest Pests
    • Ecology, Conservation, Restoration, Climate Change >
      • Pollinator Science and Apiculture
    • Evolution, Systematics and Evo-Devo
    • Genetics & Genomics and Medical Entomology
  • Extension/Outreach
    • Educational Outreach
    • Insect Camp
    • Insect Drawings
    • Insect Identification
    • Pesticide Education and Assessment Program
    • Plant Diagnostic Laboratory (PDL)